Posted on July 17, 2007 by jimhooton
During the past dozen years, researchers at the University of Arizona have built six generations of group support systems software, conducted over 150 research studies and facilitated over 4,000 projects. This article reports on the lessons learned through that experience. It begins by presenting a theoretical foundation for the Groupware grid, a tool for designing and evaluating Group Intelligence software (called Group Support software in the document). It then reports lessons from nine key domains:
- Group Intelligence in organizations
- cross-cultural and multi-cultural issues
- designing Group Intelligence software
- collaborative writing
- electronic polling
- facilities and room design for collaboration
- leadership and facilitation
- Group Intelligence in the classroom
- business process re-engineering
Lessons Learned from 12 years of Group Intelligence research
Filed under: Research | No Comments »
Posted on July 17, 2007 by jimhooton
A sample of the academic research supporting Group Intelligence
Since Dr. Jay Nunamaker of the University of Arizona first began research into the field known as Group Decision Support Systems in the mid-198os, there have been hundreds of academic studies conducted. The results of those studies led Dr. Nunamaker to form Ventana (now GroupSystems) in 1989. The research formed the basis of the first generation of our collaborative technology and it still serves as the foundation behind ThinkTank 2.0 in 2007. Click this link to citiations for 22 of the leading studies that have been conducted in this field. (The Science Behind GroupSystems) Note: nearly all of the studies have used GroupSystems technology. If you are interested in conducting new research in this field, please let me know. We offer special pricing for research licenses.
Filed under: Qualitative Research, Research | No Comments »
Posted on October 2, 2006 by jimhooton
GroupSystems customer and Mohawk College Professor Rocco Di Giovanni translated his passion for groupware into his Phd. thesis.
For his research, Dr. Di Giovanni used the “action research” process of progessive problem solving to follow three college instructors as they were introduced to group decision support software (GDSS) and incorporated it into their teaching methods.
His study “aims to address the college teacher’s experience in the context of several integrally related components: the “push” for technological innovation and collaborative learning within the college system, professional development (technology specific) that teachers find inadequate in the sense that it is not teacher-driven, nor focused on effective curriculum development, and the potential “promise” of a GDSS technology to bridge these gaps.”
Among his findings, were that all three professors “increased their interest in and commitment to continuing to learn and teach using GDSS and sharing knowledge with colleagues and administrators outside the action research group.”
Click here for an abstract of Dr. Giovanni’s research.
Filed under: Curriculum Design, Research | No Comments »
Posted on September 25, 2006 by jimhooton
Professors at San Francisco State University have a unique resource for encouraging classroom participation and they’re taking advantage of it in interesting ways. The University’s Academic Technologies group has created a “Collaboratory”
that provides the most modern classroom environment on the SF State campus for students and teachers to experience real-time collaborative learning with GroupSystems. Examples of class-related Collaboratory events using GroupSystems:
- Fashion design students plan annual fashion show
- Kinesiology students analyze body movements
- Instructional video students critique each other’s work
- Latin students translate sentences and review together
- Marketing students analyze advertisements
- Ethnic Studies students form research questions
- Several disciplines perform course evaluations
The Academic Technologies group provides this resource at no cost to students and faculty groups. Faculty members typically lead the classroom discussions in the Collaboratory, while the AT team helps run the GroupSystems software.


Filed under: Classroom Participation | Tagged: academic technologies, Classroom Participation, collaboration, collaboratory, marketing, San Francisco State University | No Comments »